22 Responses to “Hitchcock Loves Bikinis”
Share Your Thoughts
You must be logged in to post a comment.
|
Real Sports Fan Stuff Blog Sports Gifts – Sports Merchandise – Sports Fan – Sporting Goods
|
|
You must be logged in to post a comment.
He still loves babes either way!
woow.. I never thought of it like that. Smart guy! I love his films!
This is funny of Hitchcock, and a good explanation of something he did in his films a lot.
Totally agreed.
alfred hitchcock would hate you sir. He was always a free open minded person a progressive thinker. What you call “hollywood” is really no more a product of your wants. Hollywood caters to the people, if the people want good movies hollywood would give them good movies. But The people want sex and action, and so hollywood complies. Cinema today is still very powerful and amazing and i dare say better than before. You just have to look for it. You have just looked in the wrong places thats all.
I miss Hitchcock, he was one of the best if not the best.
We saw this in Drama class. Very inspiring. I honestly have to look up this guy(:
Sunmanho, yes, something like that only probably better described as a cognitive illusion. My initial reply post to you in two parts is upside down. Because of the YouTube character limitation I needed to do my reply to you in two parts and I stupidly posted the second part on top of the first. Sorry about that.
I don’t understand it quite.
you mean like an optical illusion?
Sunmanho, Metamerism is a color mutation phenomenon. A girl in a white cotton dress standing in front of an open doorway to a deck with the sun shining directly on her into the room and the walls of the room are painted bright red. If you are standing behind her the dress appears to be red in color.
She steps out of the room onto the deck in the direct sunlight and you now see that the dress is white. I am using metamerism as a metaphor for the Kuleshov effect, i.e., the mans expression takes on different emotional interpretations to a viewer when matched up with the girl holding the baby vs. the interpretation of the same girl in a bikini. I dont understand why someone chose to give thumbs down on the analogy.
Seems to me that the Kuleshov effect is emotional metamerism.
I hate this decade, this generation…
I hate Hollywood. (And I’m beginning to hate porn, too.)
Because The Birds is a classic. I think it’s wrong to remake classics. ‘If it aint broken, dont fix it’. No upgraded technology will ever replace the genius of Hitchcock. And besides, if they do remake The Birds, most young people will not even know it’s a remake, cause they probably never heard of Hitchcock. And if they know it’s a remake, they will probably despise the original, because it ‘had no technology’. Hitchcock’s work shouldn’t be touched.
why do you not want the remake?
Old man smiling reaction to the woman with the baby in her arms by todays standards equals dirty old man. By 1960 standards he would be considered a kindly man. But today he would be looking at the woman with the baby as a milf. Oh yeah, the girl in the bikini and woman with the baby are the same person. She is wearing a scarf in the footage of holding the baby as camouflage but its the same girl.
your an idiot
This is a great man.
hitchCOOK
i don’t know what that means but…if its a good non gay thing (nothing agens gays) i agree
I’d like to taste this mans pasta
They remade Psycho and it didn’t stay in the theatres very long! I have no doubt that this won’t either! I’ll protest in the only logical way that The Suits will understand: by keeping my movie money in my wallet!! I hope that others will follow suit!